We are used to the perception that because of narrow causality, we accuse fossil fuels as the cause of world climate change, then we want to eliminate it, right? Do we have to blame rice to avoid diabetes, which has carbohydrates, which causes diabetes? All chemical elements in this world must interact with each other, why don't we start from this subject? Causality steps can reduce the negative impact of all the chemical elements above. For example, for gas emissions... we can reduce them with certain methods, then eliminate them gradually so that they don't have an impact on world climate change. As far as my observations are concerned, chatter about climate change only reaches seminars, symposiums that only result in paper being wasted in trash. Why not immediately "action" on the technology that has been offered by both developed and developing countries?. Excuse me... here I see ambivalence, where the ego is the only barrier to solving a holistic problem. Well....here I became speechless. So, use all the methods that have been offered without discrimination, the important thing is that the technology has been tested and understood.
Published by Nasrul Isa Isa, vendor at Deutch Internazionale schule, etc
We are used to the perception that because of narrow causality, we accuse fossil fuels as the cause of world climate change, then we want to eliminate it, right?
Do we have to blame rice to avoid diabetes, which has carbohydrates, which causes diabetes?
All chemical elements in this world must interact with each other, why don't we start from this subject?
Causality steps can reduce the negative impact of all the chemical elements above. For example, for gas emissions... we can reduce them with certain methods, then eliminate them gradually so that they don't have an impact on world climate change.
As far as my observations are concerned, chatter about climate change only reaches seminars, symposiums that only result in paper being wasted in trash. Why not immediately "action" on the technology that has been offered by both developed and developing countries?. Excuse me... here I see ambivalence, where the ego is the only barrier to solving a holistic problem. Well....here I became speechless.
So, use all the methods that have been offered without discrimination, the important thing is that the technology has been tested and understood.
Do we have to blame rice to avoid diabetes, which has carbohydrates, which causes diabetes?
All chemical elements in this world must interact with each other, why don't we start from this subject?
Causality steps can reduce the negative impact of all the chemical elements above. For example, for gas emissions... we can reduce them with certain methods, then eliminate them gradually so that they don't have an impact on world climate change.
As far as my observations are concerned, chatter about climate change only reaches seminars, symposiums that only result in paper being wasted in trash. Why not immediately "action" on the technology that has been offered by both developed and developing countries?. Excuse me... here I see ambivalence, where the ego is the only barrier to solving a holistic problem. Well....here I became speechless.
So, use all the methods that have been offered without discrimination, the important thing is that the technology has been tested and understood.