Managing Outcome for Sustainability
Published on by Charles Hemba, Managing Partner at JEDACH Development Partners
A trip around areas where programs on WASH have been implemented will reveal uncomfortable sights like broken-down water sources (borehole handpumps), open defecation sites where CLTS had been implemented and certain practices that may be considered counter-hygienic after some time. The idea of development is basically hinged on sustainability and the more these areas relapse, the more we will continue to experience counter development. How do we now manage our outcome such that we don't have this situation?
5 Answers
-
Charles, what are the water risk assessment methods you apply on field? I need some guidance in regard of these assessment methods.
-
@Dave and Kevin, if it has become an acceptable phenomena who then should chart the course and what do we need to do so that things work differently?
-
everyone needs to see why they are failing.
-
A new approach is required. http://youtu.be/1X3f8xCnZfY The NGO attempts have failed.
-
Hi Charles Having worked overseas for a number of years, I became so exasperated by the waste on aid projects that I wrote a paper on it: http://felixschrodinger.wordpress.com/2011/07/16/planning-for-sustainability/ regards Peter