Thanks, I posted this on MJDOA Facebook page……Outstanding find, sir!Thanks,Steve Sent from my iPadOn Jun 30, 2024, at 9:18 AM, Keith Freit...

Published on by

Thanks, I posted this on MJDOA Facebook page……
Outstanding find, sir!
Thanks,Steve
Sent from my iPad

On Jun 30, 2024, at 9:18 AM, Keith Freitas wrote:


Having said this previous statement there still remains forces at play that are seeking to game an advantage over others within this failed law environment. If these forces win over and power their way through, it's conceivable that they will qush any types of studies that offer a gleam of hope and sanity to the most aggrieved by SGMA.

My disclaimer !

Keith

On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 9:12 AM Keith Freitas wrote:
The premise of the (value) behind this study is that the State engineering silos who are proponents pushing a narrative and an agenda that supports the goals and objectives of the left wing environmental wackos, "who are now staffers" crafting events from the inside out now lose the legal (engerninnering value) of the claims that subsidence cannot be reversed, repaird, or mitigated. This is a very very valuable leverage tool for the argument that SGMA was built from the bottom up based on a "false narrative" , i.e. The land subsidence can now be reversed utilizing the old farming practices of flood irrigation and/or replication of the same using a groundwater recharge system. These old state water board arguments collapse in a judicial system whereby the supreme court will not allow a "failed science" to propagate the ruin of an entire agricultural economic infrastructure. My best guess is that the right law firm and/or attorney will also see the value of this study and ask the Federal Justices to rewrite SGMA and/or allow the courts a broader jurisdiction at the appellate level to apply the right science and engineering to the now failed assumptions that the sustainable groundwater quality act was foundationed on. There are now two competing silos within the state governance that are allowing staffers to dictate assumptions on false models. Once this gets in the blood of the mainstream litigators, these findings will drive change and a push to rewrite SGMA in a way that the agricultural industry has the capacity and capability to fix a problem that otherwise based on false assumptions would have been impossible to fix. You cannot fix something that on its basis requires a water source that is simply not available to the aggrieved, i.e. If they don't have access to flood waters they will never be able to cure many parts of the seven deadly sins. The original SGMA model was drafted and designed for forced failure.

Keith Freitas, a small family farmer

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Keith Freitas
Date: Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 7:09 AM
Subject: Stanford study shows where – and why – recharge is uplifting sunken ground - SJV Water
To: Djhay1983@gmail.com , Julie Freitas , Ellen Wehr



https://sjvwater.org/stanford-study-shows-where-and-why-recharge-is-uplifting-sunken-ground/