Those nations still "fixated" on the use of Chem's - normally Chlorine, but others as well - to "treat" raw water &/or other consumed items (as well as those workers who's tasks require the be around products so treated, & having to constantly breath Chem-spray filled air!), are simply "tempting the fates" of their constituents' health & safety with such reckless practices. There are now PROVEN alternatives; often even more "efficient/cost-effective" in nature; but at least specifically free of such population safety risks as are illustrated in this article. One of the major negative features of still-widely used Chlorine now - a chemical now research-PROVEN to be a known Carcinogen, as well as with high negative health "side-effects" so dire, that over 2 dozen major research institutions have unanimously recommended it "not be ingested, in any manner, by man nor beast". Yet even such prestigious institutions/organizations as the UN's WHO & UNICEF are still encouraging its use/defending its "safety" (& flatly denying the PROVEN negative health side-effects!). One can't help but wonder who's "payroll" they're truly respondent to! National leaders in developing nations have pointed out yet another major "natural disaster" source they're now all too often experiencing: Tanker-truck loads of Chlorine that have accidents resulting in spills, are thereby creating ecological/environmental "disaster" zones; which take untold amount of time to recover from. "Nature" sends us signals, as to what's health/effective or not; but our "base-line" $ factor considerations are overwhelming those cautionary signals: IT'S TIME WE DRASTICALLY REVERSED THAT MENTALITY!

Published by

Those nations still "fixated" on the use of Chem's - normally Chlorine, but others as well - to "treat" raw water &/or other consumed items (as well as those workers who's tasks require the be around products so treated, & having to constantly breath Chem-spray filled air!), are simply "tempting the fates" of their constituents' health & safety with such reckless practices. There are now PROVEN alternatives; often even more "efficient/cost-effective" in nature; but at least specifically free of such population safety risks as are illustrated in this article. One of the major negative features of still-widely used Chlorine now - a chemical now research-PROVEN to be a known Carcinogen, as well as with high negative health "side-effects" so dire, that over 2 dozen major research institutions have unanimously recommended it "not be ingested, in any manner, by man nor beast". Yet even such prestigious institutions/organizations as the UN's WHO & UNICEF are still encouraging its use/defending its "safety" (& flatly denying the PROVEN negative health side-effects!). One can't help but wonder who's "payroll" they're truly respondent to! National leaders in developing nations have pointed out yet another major "natural disaster" source they're now all too often experiencing: Tanker-truck loads of Chlorine that have accidents resulting in spills, are thereby creating ecological/environmental "disaster" zones; which take untold amount of time to recover from. "Nature" sends us signals, as to what's health/effective or not; but our "base-line" $ factor considerations are overwhelming those cautionary signals: IT'S TIME WE DRASTICALLY REVERSED THAT MENTALITY!