Environmental Impact Assessment with Special Reference to Water Resources Projects

Published on by in Technology

Environmental Impact Assessment with Special Reference to Water Resources Projects

Environmental Impact Assessment with Special Reference to Water Resources Projects

 

Dr. Amartya Kumar Bhattacharya

BCE (Hons.) ( Jadavpur ), MTech ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), PhD ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), Cert.MTERM ( AIT Bangkok ), CEng(I), FIE, FACCE(I), FISH, FIWRS, FIPHE, FIAH, FAE, MIGS, MIGS – Kolkata Chapter, MIGS – Chennai Chapter, MISTE, MAHI, MISCA, MIAHS, MISTAM, MNSFMFP, MIIBE, MICI, MIEES, MCITP, MISRS, MISRMTT, MAGGS, MCSI, MIAENG, MMBSI, MBMSM

Chairman and Managing Director,

MultiSpectra Consultants,

23, Biplabi Ambika Chakraborty Sarani,

Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal, INDIA.

E-mail: dramartyakumar@gmail.com

Website: https://multispectraconsultants.com

 

 

Water resources projects occupy an important place in the development of any country. A project has certain environmental impacts, which must be considered during the planning of the project. The development of a country is primarily considered to be based on economic parameters like gross national income, per-capita income, etc. However, in doing so enough weightage is often not given to environmental parameters of a country. Economic development that damages the environment is not desirable because such economic development is not sustainable. We can explain what sustainable development is in a few words. Sustainable development basically means that if our succeeding generations could be a party to the decision that we make today, they would agree to it.

 

To ensure sustainable development, the development must enhance the quality of the environment and if it not possible to do so, it should at least ensure that the environment is not degraded. In the context of water resources development, what does the word environment mean? Environment includes water, soil, flora, fauna and of course human beings. There has been a debate as to whether human beings or nature should be at the heart of environmental impact assessment. There are some people who believe that nature should be at the core of environmental protection activities and should be protected to the greatest possible extent. There are others who believe that human beings should be at the core of environmental protection and a project should enhance the quality of human life in ways other than economic.

 

It can be said that there is a hierarchy with human beings at the top, the environment in the middle and water at the bottom which means that water can be considered to be only a component of the total environment and environment is only one of the factors that make up the quality of human life. Environment Impact Assesment (E.I.A.) is a term generally used to asses the environmental impact of any project. For example, the construction of a high dam will result in creation of a large reservoir which will submerge forests, wildlife, villages and agricultural land. The proper rehabilitation of the affected villagers is an important aspect of dam construction. Similarly flora and fauna have to be preserved and if there are historical monuments within the submerged area, they have to be properly rehabilitated elsewhere.

 

It is often believed that development and preservation of the environment are in conflict but it need not be so. There is an example in the Midnapore district in West Bengal where a project, originally meant for flood control, has given rise to a beautiful lake which can be developed as a tourist spot.

 

Another question that is relevant pertains to as to when the E.I.A. should be conducted. One approach may be to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the project based on economic considerations alone, and only if the project is feasible from economic considerations to go in for an E.I.A. Another idea is to conduct an Initial Environmental Examination (I.E.E.) at the time of initial planning of the project, thus embedding environmental considerations into the project conceptualisation. The I.E.E. need not be a very elaborate affair but may merely take into account the probable environmental impacts of a project in a loosely defined way. Another question relates to whether the group conducting the economic analysis should also conduct the E.I.A. or whether an independent group should be entrusted with the job of conducting the E.I.A. to eliminate any possibility of bias.

 

E.I.A. has been conducted for diverse cases. In Germany, E.I.A. has been conducted on the project of doubling some lock gates on the river Moser which flows past Metz in France and joins the river Rhine at Koblenz in Germany. In India too, E.I.A. has been used in numerous situations in water-related projects.

 

The environment is one of the key factors affecting the quality of human life. The floods in Kolkata of 1978 are still fresh in the minds of many people. Faulty urban drainage was one of the causes of that flood because storm water which flows in Kolkata from West to East was unable to drain out properly due, in part, to the rapid urbanisation of Eastern Kolkata. E.I.A. needs to be done before embarking on a planned expansion of a city, not only with regard to urban drainage but also with respect to other environmental factors affecting city life.

 

All said and done, E.I.A. is not a panacea for all environmental problems. Some environment-related problems may remain in a development project in spite of E.I.A. being carried out. However, E.I.A. can go a long way in enhancing the environment-friendliness of a project.

 

© MultiSpectra Consultants, 2020.

Media

Taxonomy

3 Comments

  1. A thorough assessment of environmental impact should always begin with a detailed definition of the purpose of the project and a definition of the scope of the impact assessment.  What is the ultimate goal that we hope to achieve with this project and what environmental aspects will we consider in the assessment of impacts?  Once we understand what the goals are, we can then proceed with a description of the proposed project and the assessment of impacts in accordance with the scope of the assessment. 

    The scoping of the assessment should not be overlooked and should be given adequate time and resources to ensure that all significant stakeholders have an opportunity to input the process to ensure that the assessment will cover all important issues.  There is much that could be said about the importance of scoping in the EIS process, but I won't go into that here.  

    I do have one last comment regarding your discussion of the focus of an environmental assessment.  You mentioned placing priority on human beings, the environment or on some aspect of the environment such as water.  I think we have to acknowledge that ALL projects are undertaken for the primary purpose of addressing a human need or benefiting humans in some way even if it's purpose is primarily environmental protection or enhancement. For example, if the project purpose is to improve water quality by eliminating pollution sources (i.e., a project that focuses on the environment), doesn't that goal have wide ranging long-term benefits to human populations in terms of drinking water, irrigation, food production, fisheries, wildlife, recreation, human health and well-being?  Improvements in the environment should always result in benefits to humans.  A project that benefits humans while degrading the environment is not sustainable long-term and will eventually fail and require another project to repair the damage.  A well scoped EIS will identify these issues and provide ways to eliminate or mitigate potential damages at the design stage. 

  3. Very nicely explained by author of EIA article.

    Can be a strategy, 1st step conduct an IEE.

    Next a Rapid EIA, with Audit assesment followed by EIA mainly on benefits accrued other than issues.

    Well wishes.

    Ajit Seshadri.