The $18 billion global salmon farming industry must step up investment in new technology if it to grow in the face of growing environmental and biological constraints.

So argues a report published today by non-profit financial think tank Planet Tracker, which points out that salmon production is fast approaching the practical physical limits permitted by current coastal farming methods.

Despite this, the industry is still some way from moving to more sustainable and cost-effective methods at scale, according to the report.

It argues that, while positive mid-term demand and higher prices may give the impression of a stable and profitable sector, both large- and small-scale producers in the farmed salmon sector face significant environmental threats such as climate change, disease, sea lice and harmful algal blooms.

"Compounded by issues such as collapsing wild-catch feedstock fisheries, the industry and its investors face considerable financial risk of increased environmental constraint-based losses and price volatility," the report adds.

Such price volatility is already apparent due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has reduced demand for farmed Atlantic salmon (the second most commercially valuable farmed aquatic species) and resulted in a 14 percent decline in spot prices in Q1 2020. Depending on post-COVID-19 recovery time, markets could see oversupply over the next 12 to 24 months, exacerbating suppressed prices.

Planet Tracker estimates that if historic trends continue and coastal ecological health continues declining, total production forecasts for coastal farmed Atlantic salmon to 2025 may be 6 percent to 8 percent lower than predicted, equivalent to $4.1 billion. This is particularly significant for the industry’s highly-concentrated investor pool, with the top 20 - including Vanguard, DNB Asset Management and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board - accounting for over $15 billion in holdings. Salmon production itself is also highly concentrated, with nearly 50 percent in Norway, the UK, Chile and Canada carried out by just ten publicly-traded companies, with a total market capitalisation of $28 billion.

According to the report, if the sector is to continue to increase production supply and manage its environmental exposure, "it will eventually need to expand beyond intensive coastal farms, either to offshore closed caged systems (CCS) where the biological constraints are reduced; or to high-tech inland recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) which are still in the experimental stage. Either option will entail substantial investment and likely to cause salmon prices per kilogram to increase through to 2030".

Though subject to market price pressures and early stage development challenges, particularly in scaling the technology, investors should weigh the higher capital and operating expenditure and risks of offshore and inland farming against the environmental risk mitigation benefits that these new technologies can bring in reducing production losses.

As such, Planet Tracker recommends that farmed salmon companies should, by the end of 2020:

• Report on compliance with environmental regulations and industry guidelines to highlight their environmental commitments to investors making them more attractive for investment.
• Maintain and report on an effective environmental and social management system (ESMS). such as the CDC ESMS Toolkit. Such frameworks should be auditable and published and provide 100 percent citing of reasons for salmon losses.
• Deploy remote electronic monitoring systems with live data feeds accessible by investors and covering core environmental metrics such as water temperature and effluent control.
• Increase research and development spending on environmental risk mitigation such as disease and sea lice control measures.
• Strengthen control of third-party independent audited transparency and traceability reporting for all feed sources.

And by 2021, investors can help manage their exposure by:

• Requiring companies to present and publish effective ESMS to support analysis of companies’ valuation, financial performance and risk exposure.
• Pushing for assessments detailing chemical and antibiotic inputs into waterways and their origins to mitigate the incidence rates of harmful algal blooms and other problems.
• Advocating for marine spatial planning to maximise sustainable farmed salmon production and mitigate environmental risks.
• Applying consistent methodologies, accounting standards (such as IAS 41) and reporting descriptions for both materialised environment-related losses and stocking values.
• Providing an updated log of all salmon losses and account for the related financial costs, monitor environmental constraint losses and follow revised maximum allowable biomass thresholds for 2020 post COVID-19.

by The Fish Site

Media

Taxonomy

• Fisheries