Change of the Climate

Climate change is the result of unreasonable human impact on natural resources.

    It is necessary to pay attention to the main component of nature - water, as the most common and most necessary product of all living things on Earth

The water was created in a long-term interaction with the biota.

    Man with his appearance began to use water as a working reagent. Washing, drying, heating, squeezing is a number of technological processes in which water is used as a physical object. The incoming water with precipitation evaporates back into the atmosphere without performing its functions - passing through food chains. Water must have a full cycle of transformations. The reduced or withdrawn element of the transformation increases in volume and speed of turnover with each passing year, every day. Unnatural evaporation fills the surface layers of the atmosphere, create their mindless water cycle, which is the cause of the growth of natural disasters and the approaching world catastrophe.

    "Green technologies", reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases - all these activities are private components in the cycle of substances. Of course, they are important, but in essence they are microscopic in terms of volume and degree of impact in comparison with the change in the parameters of evaporation.

       The second, if not the first, especially important human impact on evaporation is the consequences of the increase in arable land, the destruction of forests, the filling of new reservoirs and a host of other ways to destroy the territories of one's own residence.

     A person needs to reconsider their actions and urgently create a new concept for returning water to its natural functions. The main components in the new Concept should be the urgent stoppage of all processes for the destruction of land. We have already killed 67% of the fertile soil, each hectare of which contains 20 tons of underground living creatures.

Media

Taxonomy

• Climate Induced Hazard
• Climate Change
• Climate Change Adaptation
• Climate Change Resilience
• Climate Protection
• Climate

5 Answers

1. That's right, Amit Darak.If we want to preserve the planet, we must reconsider our attitude to water.Revise all technologies in terms of reducing water use.For example, to reduce washes, dry cleaning methods are known.Optimize the processes of quenching, cooling systems, heat transfer and sewerage.

2. Use of water has been increasing for many years, however with growth in industrialization and advancements in manufacturing technologies, the resource consumption (including water) has been neglected. Industries need to move towards better water management and improving water use efficiency.

   1 Comment

   1. In fact of the matter, Amit Darak
      With water, you should treat not as a working reagent, but treat it respectfully. It was not necessary earlier, and now, to build a hydroelectric station with the flooding of huge areas. Agriculture should not spend so much water on irrigation. Drip irrigation has already been known for a long time, and without plowing. In everyday life we ​​consume a lot of water. A new concept is urgently needed to return water to its natural ways. Otherwise, the water will go the other way, it will destroy all life. Already goes, began to defend itself by natural disasters. These are warnings.
      The growing pace of construction of new reservoirs, river turns, the development of new deposits, irrational water costs in technology and everyday life lead to disaster.

3. Climate action pylons and turbines - retrofited to integrate renewable acquisition with CO2 capture and conveyance for use in enhancing growth in enclosed sapling nurseries an horticultural complexes, and also fertiliser manufacture, is the beginning of the next agricultural revolution, this time to include agro-forestry like the Chagga Gardens on the slopes of Kilmanjaro.

4. Look at the attached link.
   I believe that there is convincing evidence.
   But I can consider all doubts.

5. Oleg

   Very interesting points made here. 

   Where is your research data on unnatural evaporation ? I would like to know more about this please .

   1 Comment

   1. A hypothesis is proposed that can be proved.
      Studies on evaporation are not found, the conclusions set forth in the article are made as a result of logical constructions. So, for example, it is known that as a result of exhalation, human diseases are diagnosed. For excreta and pheromones, animals find each other and prey. Flowers and many plants have odors. Hence, the conclusion is that every living thing and plant has purely individual evaporation. Water evaporates from the asphalt or steam generator into the atmosphere, not having fulfilled its functions. And these functions are defined by millions of years of interaction with the biota.
             It is impossible to carry out scientific proofs of differences in evaporation alone. That's why I attract the attention of specialists who are close to such a topic.