Thrust Control in Distribution Systems
Published on by Besjon Ndreu, Project Engineer in Academic
My first question here.
In thrust control, in order to prevent the pipes from moving outward, I'm given 4 general methods:
- installation of thrust blocks,
- installation of thrust anchors,
- use of restraining fittings or joints,
- use of batter piles.
Can anyone explain to me the use of batter piles, in different words?
Taxonomy
- Water Hammer protection
- Urban Water Supply
- Infrastructure
- Infrastructure Management
- Pipeline
- Pipeline Installation & Maintenance
- Distribution
5 Answers
-
Thank you all for your answers. It was really helpful.
-
Normally use of thrust blocks is the age old solution to centrifugal forces on water mains.
But Batter piles may be an option in exceptional cases like poor soils with or without high water table, soil conditions of low shear strength etc.,in which case they need to be anchored properly with proper alignment to take up the forces on them. Bearing piles may be preferred to friction piles. Conditions of negative skin friction need to be totally avoided.
-
Use of concrete thrust blocks at pipe bends in a distribution network is the safest and cheapest way to protect piping from damage due to centrifugal force at the bend. I don't think using batter piles is a viable solution.
-
Dear besjon, i am afraid to disappoint but have never used batter piles.
-
A Driven Pile Advantage: Batter Piles
Introduction The ability to install driven piles on an angle, or batter, gives them a distinct advantage with respect to their ability to carry lateral loads. Batter piles carry lateral loads primarily in axial compression and/or tension while vertical deep foundations carry lateral loads in shear and bending. When subjected to lateral loading, batter piles will therefore generally have a greater capacity and be subject to smaller deformations than vertical piles of the same dimensions and material. Large shear and moment loads induced at the pile head have been a source of performance problems with batter piles in some cases. However, these problems can be mitigated by appropriate design and detailing of the pile-structure connection. Until the 1990s, batter piles were a common means for carrying lateral loads, particularly when the lateral loads were large, there was a large unsupported length, or there were weak soils at the ground surface. Examples of such situations include seismic design of bridges and design of marginal wharfs and other port and harbor structures. In the 1990s, following the poor performance of batter piles in a series of earthquakes, some engineers began advising against the use of batter piles. However, once the reason for the poor performance of batter piles was understood, engineers developed design strategies to address these problems. Using these strategies, batter piles have once again become an important weapon in the engineer’s arsenal for designing foundations subject to lateral loads.
Link to the PDF "a Driven Pile Advantage: Batter Piles By Edward Kavazanjian, Jr., Ph.D., P.E., Associate Professor and Interim Chair, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Arizona State University
Also attached
1 Comment
-
Seth McIntosh thank you for the answer, i edited your answer to post an abstract of the paper, and attached the paper itself.
1 Comment reply
-
Thank you.
-
-