It is good fire safety and efficiency to reduce leakages! Cost effective technology is always a win.  Scientific and Non Technical Risk Assessment perspective.  Methane a Non Problem. Other than flammability. I could never find a Bio-essay study on Methane and ecotoxicity!  Baseline Testing!! Possibly the real beneficial use of this technology! What if the gas was leaking already and that is why it is a viable gas drilling location? It is always good to do baseline testing of any bubbling from the soil - prior to any operations including vibroseis! The reason: the highly paid environmentalists are oftentimes in the employ of International companies that do not want competition to their imports, and will readily send in a circus to disrupt the exploration (as experienced in a New Brunswick play).  Any methane leaks could be blamed on an operator - and they could lose millions, even though Methane is inconsequential! A flame works as a failsafe test in the case of minor bubbling away from wellheads of course I am talking before any alterations to the land. I have done this at a location and observed flammable bubbling.   Secondly beware the Chinese state is complicit in the Carbon scam; and would readily disrupt and Western projects - to gain the advantage by using Carbon Credits and Grants to reverse engineer CCS infrastructure - such as was the case in South Dakota. All this with Imminent Domain and I personally am certain that the CO2 injection wells would simply be Fracked and then plugged into the gas grid and there would be a major new player that sneaked in with CO2 taxes fraudulently extorted from White Western Civilization at the expense of our de-industrialization.  More on the Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Global Warming fraud:  https://www.thegwpf.org/publications/the-state-of-the-climate-2022/ https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/WCD-version-081423.pdf https://clintel.nl/al-17-jaar-geen-afname-meer-in-zeeijs-rond-de-noordpool/ https://sciencetalks.nl/greenhouse-gas-co2-should-not-be-feared/#comment-272 https://klimarealistene.com/vager-politikerne-a-lytte-til-ssb/ https://sciencetalks.nl/590-2/ https://www.climategate.nl/ https://co2coalition.org/media/how-co2-saves-the-earth-greenhouse-gas-have-vital-warming-cooling-effects/ https://co2coalition.org/media/methane-the-irrelevant-green-house-gas/ https://www.icsc-canada.com/ https://c-c-netzwerk.ch/images/ccn-blog_articles/717/Confessions-Nakamura.pdf https://klimarealisme.dk/2023/10/17/klimakampens-selvpinere-og-missionaerer/ https://www.icsc-canada.com/ https://rairfoundation.com/all-the-facts-you-need-to-debunk-climate-change-scammers-video/ https://www.icsf.ie/useful-links https://www.climategate.nl/ https://co2coalition.org/media/how-co2-saves-the-earth-greenhouse-gas-have-vital-warming-cooling-effects/ https://co2coalition.org/media/methane-the-irrelevant-green-house-gas/ Book: The Global Warming Hypothesis is an Unproven Hypothesis, Dr. Nakamura explains why the data foundation underpinning global warming science is “untrustworthy” and cannot be relied on:“Global mean temperatures before 1980 are based on untrustworthy data,” writes Nakamura. Before full planet surface observation by satellite began in 1980, only a small part of the Earth had been observed for temperatures with only a certain amount of accuracy and frequency. Across the globe, only North America and Western Europe have trustworthy temperature data dating back to the 19th century.”From 1990 to 2014, Nakamura worked on cloud dynamics and forces mixing atmospheric and ocean flows on medium to planetary scales. His bases were MIT (for a Doctor of Science in meteorology), Georgia Institute of Technology, Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Duke and Hawaii Universities and the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. He has published 20+ climate papers on fluid dynamics. There is no questioning the man’s credibility or knowledge base. Today’s ‘global warming science’ is akin to an upside down pyramid which is built on the work of a few climate modelers. These AGW pioneers claim to have demonstrated human-derived CO2 emissions as the cause of recently rising temperatures and have then simply projected that warming forward. Every climate researcher thereafter has taken the results of these original models as a given, and we’re even at the stage now where merely testing their validity is regarded as heresy. https://c-c-netzwerk.ch/images/ccn-blog_articles/717/Confessions-Nakamura.pdf Thank you for sharing your insights! I would be glad to work on air emissions and water treatment from Oil Shale and Shale Oil and Gas; as these are still abundant resources!

Published by

It is good fire safety and efficiency to reduce leakages! Cost effective technology is always a win. 
Scientific and Non Technical Risk Assessment perspective.  Methane a Non Problem. Other than flammability. I could never find a Bio-essay study on Methane and ecotoxicity! 
Baseline Testing!! Possibly the real beneficial use of this technology! What if the gas was leaking already and that is why it is a viable gas drilling location?
It is always good to do baseline testing of any bubbling from the soil - prior to any operations including vibroseis! The reason: the highly paid environmentalists are oftentimes in the employ of International companies that do not want competition to their imports, and will readily send in a circus to disrupt the exploration (as experienced in a New Brunswick play). 
Any methane leaks could be blamed on an operator - and they could lose millions, even though Methane is inconsequential!
A flame works as a failsafe test in the case of minor bubbling away from wellheads of course I am talking before any alterations to the land. I have done this at a location and observed flammable bubbling.  
Secondly beware the Chinese state is complicit in the Carbon scam; and would readily disrupt and Western projects - to gain the advantage by using Carbon Credits and Grants to reverse engineer CCS infrastructure - such as was the case in South Dakota. All this with Imminent Domain and I personally am certain that the CO2 injection wells would simply be Fracked and then plugged into the gas grid and there would be a major new player that sneaked in with CO2 taxes fraudulently extorted from White Western Civilization at the expense of our de-industrialization. 

More on the Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Global Warming fraud: 
https://www.thegwpf.org/publications/the-state-of-the-climate-2022/
https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/WCD-version-081423.pdf
https://clintel.nl/al-17-jaar-geen-afname-meer-in-zeeijs-rond-de-noordpool/
https://sciencetalks.nl/greenhouse-gas-co2-should-not-be-feared/#comment-272
https://klimarealistene.com/vager-politikerne-a-lytte-til-ssb/
https://sciencetalks.nl/590-2/
https://www.climategate.nl/
https://co2coalition.org/media/how-co2-saves-the-earth-greenhouse-gas-have-vital-warming-cooling-effects/
https://co2coalition.org/media/methane-the-irrelevant-green-house-gas/
https://www.icsc-canada.com/
https://c-c-netzwerk.ch/images/ccn-blog_articles/717/Confessions-Nakamura.pdf
https://klimarealisme.dk/2023/10/17/klimakampens-selvpinere-og-missionaerer/
https://www.icsc-canada.com/
https://rairfoundation.com/all-the-facts-you-need-to-debunk-climate-change-scammers-video/
https://www.icsf.ie/useful-links
https://www.climategate.nl/
https://co2coalition.org/media/how-co2-saves-the-earth-greenhouse-gas-have-vital-warming-cooling-effects/
https://co2coalition.org/media/methane-the-irrelevant-green-house-gas/

Book: The Global Warming Hypothesis is an Unproven Hypothesis, Dr. Nakamura explains why the data foundation underpinning global warming science is “untrustworthy” and cannot be relied on:“Global mean temperatures before 1980 are based on untrustworthy data,” writes Nakamura. Before full planet surface observation by satellite began in 1980, only a small part of the Earth had been observed for temperatures with only a certain amount of accuracy and frequency. Across the globe, only North America and Western Europe have trustworthy temperature data dating back to the 19th century.”From 1990 to 2014, Nakamura worked on cloud dynamics and forces mixing atmospheric and ocean flows on medium to planetary scales. His bases were MIT (for a Doctor of Science in meteorology), Georgia Institute of Technology, Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Duke and Hawaii Universities and the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. He has published 20+ climate papers on fluid dynamics. There is no questioning the man’s credibility or knowledge base. Today’s ‘global warming science’ is akin to an upside down pyramid which is built on the work of a few climate modelers. These AGW pioneers claim to have demonstrated human-derived CO2 emissions as the cause of recently rising temperatures and have then simply projected that warming forward. Every climate researcher thereafter has taken the results of these original models as a given, and we’re even at the stage now where merely testing their validity is regarded as heresy.
https://c-c-netzwerk.ch/images/ccn-blog_articles/717/Confessions-Nakamura.pdf

Thank you for sharing your insights! I would be glad to work on air emissions and water treatment from Oil Shale and Shale Oil and Gas; as these are still abundant resources!