I am a firm believer in all vortex technology.  from rocket engine designs, toilet flushing vortex systems, data compression for computer memory storage, and now we use this basic technology to help understand tornados and hurricanes.  As much of being a fan that I am I must be logical as to the limitations of this technology. All natural vortexes are beneficial. Man made vortex items are always less efficient than natures.  Aside from the obvious. There appears to be a worldwide movement to be aware of and be part of a circular economy. Many ways of doing this of course. But carbon "police" use a term called "Carbon foot print".  Hang in there a moment. Onvector can fix their own problem if it is pointed out to them.  A rough calculation is for every one unit of cleaned item you require 10 units of carbon "foot print" to accomplish your mechanical solution.  Most at best are shooting to be carbon neutral.  I just can not see the logic of improving the bottom line of an industry that charges monies for a free natural resource at the expense of nature and its inhabitants.  There are several non mechanical and non chemical items that do this natural biological function at a fraction of the cost.  This type of technology would be most useful in the transition from centralized water and waste water purification to a decentralized construct. This would eliminate massive infrastructure and their costs and have emergency water supply on location in case of power outage and water contamination.  Puerto Rico most certainly could have benefited from this.  Hard to knock out the electrical grid when there is no grid.  Home water, wastewater processing, electrical collection and storage, food and other items for long term storage.  Think of the suffering that would be prevented. A big difference in survive and thrive.  Think about it.

Published by

 I am a firm believer in all vortex technology.  from rocket engine designs, toilet flushing vortex systems, data compression for computer memory storage, and now we use this basic technology to help understand tornados and hurricanes.  As much of being a fan that I am I must be logical as to the limitations of this technology. All natural vortexes are beneficial. Man made vortex items are always less efficient than natures.  Aside from the obvious. There appears to be a worldwide movement to be aware of and be part of a circular economy. Many ways of doing this of course. But carbon "police" use a term called "Carbon foot print".  Hang in there a moment. Onvector can fix their own problem if it is pointed out to them.  A rough calculation is for every one unit of cleaned item you require 10 units of carbon "foot print" to accomplish your mechanical solution.  Most at best are shooting to be carbon neutral.  I just can not see the logic of improving the bottom line of an industry that charges monies for a free natural resource at the expense of nature and its inhabitants.  There are several non mechanical and non chemical items that do this natural biological function at a fraction of the cost.  This type of technology would be most useful in the transition from centralized water and waste water purification to a decentralized construct. This would eliminate massive infrastructure and their costs and have emergency water supply on location in case of power outage and water contamination.  Puerto Rico most certainly could have benefited from this.  Hard to knock out the electrical grid when there is no grid.  Home water, wastewater processing, electrical collection and storage, food and other items for long term storage.  Think of the suffering that would be prevented. A big difference in survive and thrive.  Think about it.