Peter Petersen 15 hours ago Good evening. When I look at the different levels of leadership starting with the government at the top, and working my way down to the management, I look at how the laws that were established by the government, how these laws that are enforced by the governance, and how these laws that are monitored by the management. I want to make a clear distinction between the definitions of these terms, look at how they differ among each other. Sometimes literature often interchanges the terms, government and governance, even though they have different functions. With that concept being said, the different levels of leadership impacts how the water resources will be managed, particularly with the increased impact of the climate change on the hydrological cycle within the watershed like increased frequency of drought, and the growing population. in other words, water shortage is becoming more real everyday, and depending upon the type of leadership that is governing the area, it will face many challenges in providing water resources to the community long term. So it is important to understand that whatever the decision-making progress is being used, it will have some impact down the road. If you have good government and good governance, you will have good management, and vise versa. Since the impact of climate change is only going to get worse, so the leadership needs to be understand the full picture starting with where water comes all way down to being distributed to the customers. Any disruption along this path will have its consequences and is it prepared to resolve the issue, particularly with water quality.
Published by Peter Petersen, Water chemist II (water quality) at Milwaukee Water Works (Retired 2021)
Peter Petersen 15 hours ago
Good evening. When I look at the different levels of leadership starting with the government at the top, and working my way down to the management, I look at how the laws that were established by the government, how these laws that are enforced by the governance, and how these laws that are monitored by the management. I want to make a clear distinction between the definitions of these terms, look at how they differ among each other. Sometimes literature often interchanges the terms, government and governance, even though they have different functions. With that concept being said, the different levels of leadership impacts how the water resources will be managed, particularly with the increased impact of the climate change on the hydrological cycle within the watershed like increased frequency of drought, and the growing population. in other words, water shortage is becoming more real everyday, and depending upon the type of leadership that is governing the area, it will face many challenges in providing water resources to the community long term. So it is important to understand that whatever the decision-making progress is being used, it will have some impact down the road. If you have good government and good governance, you will have good management, and vise versa. Since the impact of climate change is only going to get worse, so the leadership needs to be understand the full picture starting with where water comes all way down to being distributed to the customers. Any disruption along this path will have its consequences and is it prepared to resolve the issue, particularly with water quality.
1 Comment
Adapting groundwater management towards climate change was at a project we are closing now. Next to lots of hydrological modelling and monitoring approaches, governance was a central issue in our about 18 pilots (most of them on sandy soils). We defined governance as "getting things done", i.e. making sure that promising measures are implemented. Leadership needed to be complemented with broader support. Stakeholders involved in groundwater management (including local / regional / national governments, NGOs, agriculture, water provision......) discussed different approaches around the North Sea Region (Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Belgium) and exchanged on how the different regions approached issue such as reducing salinization, improving groundwater buffering, managing groundwater flooding, and protecting groundwater quality.
The close cooperation with land owners- and, depending on cultural / institutional context and issues, sometimes incentives, sometimes legal restrictions, sometimes adaptation of legal frameworks was central.
My personal main lesson: governance improves a lot it if you take the time to link science, stakeholders and groundwater management. Even in the relatively homogeneous contexts such as European Union and North Sea Region: getting things done needs a smaller scale approach. One needs to get specific.
I assume that the instititional and ecological contexts is completely different in your areas of the world. Still, maybe this inspires you. I you are interested I can share the results with you.
Published by Ilke Borowski-Maaser, Dr.