Stainless steel pipes for demineralized water from reverse osmosis?
Published on by Felipe Gonzalez Gonzalez, Consultant on Sanitary Engineering in Technology
I'm designing a Reverse Osmosis treatment facility, I will also construct it, capacity 40 m3/day. The feed water is a mix of rain water and municipal drinking water (low dissolved solids concentration). My client needs demineralized water for their production of stainless steel tubes, and he proposed using their stainless steel tubes for transporting the demi water to their processes. I know CPVC pipes are the proper ones for transporting demi water, but what about stainless steel pipes? Will the material corrode eventually? under which conditions? Pros and cons of using Stainless steel or CPVC?
Thanks in advance
Taxonomy
- Reverse Osmosis
- Scale & Corrosion
- Pipes Design
- Corrosion Prevention
- Critical Infrastructure Protection
- Pipes and Pipelines
5 Answers
-
Hello Sir,
As manufacturer of RO, we use only SS316L in drinking water with low TDS (duplex required for high chloride content, which is not the case after RO). Normally, the RO is producing continuously, then no risk of stagnant water. The storage of demi water should be large enough (let's say 1 hour storage to avoid RO starts/stops too often consuming a lot of water for the flush and conductivity control). Microbio should be followed but as any part of the plant and especially at sterilization step before RO. If the design allows CIP operation, everything will be fine.
Best regards,
Olivier.
-
Stainless Steel can be used only what needs to be considered is what is Chloride content. Generally seamless SS 316 L is OK provided there is no stagnancy and biological controls are adopted. Duplex SS 2205 may be a better choice with regular flushing to remove foulants
-
I used to work in the semi-conductor business and we used DI water for cleaning wafers. We used either CPVC or PVC to achieve 21 Meg Ohm water and you couldn't get stainless clean enough.
-
Good Afternoon Mr. Gonzalez,
Both SS and PP (polypropylene) are used for downstream piping of RO and RODI.
May we respectfully put the following out for your consideration; Your question should be proposed in a meeting with your RO vendor and Customer so that both understand the application and address potential unknowns.
Warmest regards,
FOR THE BEST TASTE IN LIFE
Celebrating 40 Years Pure Excellence
...into another Half Century re-inventing the water industry !
Think Aquathin...AquathinK !
( visit the all new www.aquathin.com )
** AN ISO9001:2000, ISO9001:2008 , ISO9001:2015 QMS REGISTERED / CERTIFIED COMPANY - (IMS 0192, NQA 12635) **
& 2008 PRESIDENT'S E STAR AWARD RECIPIENT ( visit www.aquathin.com/estar2008.pps )
Alfie
Alfred J. Lipshultz
President & CEO
Aquathin Business Center / 950 South Andrews Avenue / Pompano Beach, FL 33069
T 954 781 7777 / F 954 781 7336 /E info@aquathin.com / Skype aquathinhq.alfie
1 Comment
-
Alfred, agreed, the RO supplier should also answer my question, unfortunately, sometimes the supplier is a simple vendor and doesn't know in detail the technical information about their product. Appreciate your reply!
-
-
There are no issues with SS. It is commonly used in the biopharm market as well as food and beverage for high purity water applications. I would however recommend using 316L Stainless for better corrosion resistance. That being said, SS offers no real benefits compared to CPVC or PVC unless the distribution piping is to be sanitized using hot water (80 C) or ozone. PVC if by far less expensive but if they are fabricating the system with their own product, the SS tubing will be at a much lower cost to them. Not to mention, they can use the system as a show piece for their products. One final thought, we typically only use CPVC instead of PVC in applications where the temperature will be elevated. Standard schedule 80 PVC will work just fine and reduce install costs. Hope this helps.
1 Comment
-
Mike, this answers my question. I appreciate your help!
-